Duration of Postpartum Magnesium Sulphate for the Prevention of Eclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the optimal duration of postpartum magnesium sulphate to prevent eclampsia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception until January 2020 and limited to English-language human randomized controlled trials. Search strategy included the key works "eclampsia," "magnesium sulphate," and "postpartum." METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Title, abstract, and full-text review was performed using Covidence data-management software. Of the 3,629 articles screened, 10 studies were included in the final review. Studies were included if they compared two different time points of magnesium sulphate postpartum in women with either preeclampsia or eclampsia. TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Two authors reviewed studies independently. RevMan software was used to calculate risk difference (RD) for categorical outcomes and mean difference for continuous outcomes. Shorter duration of magnesium sulphate (12 hours or less) was not associated with increased risk of eclampsia compared with 24-hour postpartum regimens (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.01, I2 70%). Studies randomizing women with preeclampsia did not show increased risk of eclampsia with shorter regimens (RD 0, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, I2 0%), nor did trials randomizing those with eclampsia (RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.07, I2 87%). Secondary outcomes, including flushing, duration of Foley catheter insertion, time to ambulation, and duration of hospital stay, were all reduced with shorter-duration magnesium sulphate. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that a shorter duration of postpartum magnesium sulphate does not increase the risk for eclamptic seizure; however, data remain underpowered to render firm conclusions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42020182432.

Implementation of a universal postpartum blood pressure monitoring program: feasibility and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: New-onset postpartum preeclampsia has a higher risk of maternal morbidity and mortality than preeclampsia with antepartum onset, underscoring the need for earlier identification of elevated blood pressure among patients with this condition. Given the decrease in healthcare engagement, which is typical of the postpartum period, new-onset postpartum hypertension often goes unrecognized. Currently, there are no recommendations for universal postpartum blood pressure surveillance in women without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. With the shift to telemedicine because of the COVID-19 pandemic, our institution's approach was to distribute blood pressure cuffs to women receiving any portion of their prenatal care virtually, thus also providing access to an opportunity for blood pressure measurement during the postpartum period for all women. OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of a patient-driven universal postpartum home blood pressure monitoring program in women without a previous diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study of all postpartum women who were discharged from our institution from July 2020 through June 2021 and who were not previously identified to have hypertension. A clinical algorithm was developed and followed. All the women received discharge educational materials and were called at a 1-week interval by a nurse to review blood pressure and preeclampsia symptoms. The maternal demographics and delivery outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 10,092 deliveries during the study period, 5959 (59%) were successfully contacted. 352 were excluded, as they did not deliver at the primary hospital; 1052 (18%) had a previous hypertensive disorder of pregnancy diagnosis; 1522 (26%) did not have a blood pressure cuff; and 1841 (31%) planned to take their blood pressure at a later time. Precautions and blood pressure parameters were given to this last group. Of the remaining 1192, 222 (19%) had an initial elevated blood pressure. Of these, 98 had a second elevated blood pressure on recheck; 17 were referred to the emergency room for evaluation, with 8 being diagnosed with severe preeclampsia; and the remainder were recommended to follow with their obstetrical provider and enrolled in our institution's remote blood pressure management program. Of the 1192 women, 8% potentially had a new diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, with 0.7% having severe hypertension. Women with elevated blood pressures were more likely to be of non-Hispanic Black race and have a higher early pregnancy body mass index than those without elevated blood pressures. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that a patient-driven postpartum blood pressure monitoring program is feasible and may be incorporated using existing resources. In addition, our findings suggest that the incidence of new-onset postpartum hypertensive disorders of pregnancy may be higher than previously assessed in retrospective cohorts. Thus, there may be a role for closer surveillance of all women with patient-driven home blood pressure monitoring, particularly those with risk factors or in the setting of limited resources.

Maternal infection with COVID-19 and increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become worldwide, posing particularly severe challenges. Pregnancy brings changes that might make individuals more vulnerable to this viral infection. To date, the impact of COVID-19 infection on pregnancy outcomes remains controversial.Method: We performed a meta-analysis to address the impact of COVID-19 infection on pregnancy outcomes. We searched the PubMed and China National Knowledge infrastructure (CNKI) databases for related articles. The odds ratio (OR) corresponding to the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to define the impact of INFECTION and severity of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes. The statistical heterogeneity among studies was batched with the Q-test and I2 statistics.Results: We collected 38 studies including 127,805 pregnancy women. Our meta-analysis revealed that pregnant women with COVID-19 have been linked to an increased risk of premature birth (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.41-1.96), stillbirth (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.22-3.21), pre-eclampsia (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.18-1.80), and PROM (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.07-1.81).Conclusions: Our meta-analysis showed that infection with COVID-19 increases the risk of preterm birth, stillbirth, pre-eclampsia, and PROM. Screening and early care for pregnant women to intervene with COVID-19 is important, given the increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

COVID-19, Pre-Eclampsia, and Complement System.

COVID-19 is characterized by virus-induced injury leading to multi-organ failure, together with inflammatory reaction, endothelial cell (EC) injury, and prothrombotic coagulopathy with thrombotic events. Complement system (C) via its cross-talk with the contact and coagulation systems contributes significantly to the severity and pathological consequences due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. These immunopathological mechanisms overlap in COVID-19 and pre-eclampsia (PE). Thus, mothers contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy are more vulnerable to developing PE. SARS-CoV-2 infection of ECs, via its receptor ACE2 and co-receptor TMPRSS2, can provoke endothelial dysfunction and disruption of vascular integrity, causing hyperinflammation and hypercoagulability. This is aggravated by bradykinin increase due to inhibition of ACE2 activity by the virus. C is important for the progression of normal pregnancy, and its dysregulation can impact in the form of PE-like syndrome as a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thus, there is also an overlap between treatment regimens of COVID-19 and PE. C inhibitors, especially those targeting C3 or MASP-2, are exciting options for treating COVID-19 and consequent PE. In this review, we examine the role of C, contact and coagulation systems as well as endothelial hyperactivation with respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and likely development of PE.

Dose of aspirin to prevent preterm preeclampsia in women with moderate or high-risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of aspirin dose on the incidence of all gestational age preeclampsia and preterm preeclampsia. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Web of Science) were searched for articles published between January 1985 and March 2019 with no language restrictions. METHODS: We followed the PRIMSA guidelines and utilized Covidence software. Articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers, with discrepancies settled by an independent 3rd party. Study selection criteria were randomized trials comparing aspirin for prevention of all gestational age and preterm preeclampsia to placebo or no antiplatelet treatment in women aged 15-55 years with moderate or high-risk factors according to the list of risk factors from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. The quality of trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The data were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis comparing aspirin at doses of <81, 81, 100, and 150 mg. Pre-specified outcomes were all gestational age and preterm preeclampsia. RESULTS: Of 1,609 articles screened, 23 randomized trials, which included 32,370 women, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In preterm preeclampsia, women assigned at random to 150 mg experienced a significant 62% reduction in risk of preterm preeclampsia (RR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20-0.72; P = 0.011). Aspirin doses <150 mg produced no significant reductions. The number needed to treat with 150 mg of aspirin was 39 (95% CI: 23-100). There was a maximum 30% reduction in risk of all gestational age preeclampsia at all aspirin doses. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, based on indirect comparisons, aspirin at a dose greater than the current, recommended 81 mg was associated with the highest reduction in preterm preeclampsia. Our meta-analysis is limited due to the deficiency of homogeneous high evidence data available in the literature to date; however, it may be prudent for clinicians to consider that the optimal aspirin dose may be higher than the current guidelines advise. Future research to compare the efficacy aspirin doses greater than 81 mg is recommended. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42019127951 (University of York, UK; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).

A Proposed Plan for Prenatal Care to Minimize Risks of COVID-19 to Patients and Providers: Focus on Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Hypertensive disorders are the most common medical complications of pregnancy and a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and death. The detection of elevated blood pressure during pregnancy is one of the cardinal aspects of optimal antenatal care. With the outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the risk for person-to-person spread of the virus, there is a desire to minimize unnecessary visits to health care facilities. Women should be classified as low risk or high risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and adjustments can be accordingly made in the frequency of maternal and fetal surveillance. During this pandemic, all pregnant women should be encouraged to obtain a sphygmomanometer. Patients monitored for hypertension as an outpatient should receive written instructions on the important signs and symptoms of disease progression and provided contact information to report the development of any concern for change in status. As the clinical management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia is the same, assessment of urinary protein is unnecessary in the management once a diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy is made. Pregnant women with suspected hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and signs and symptoms associated with the severe end of the disease spectrum (e.g., headaches, visual symptoms, epigastric pain, and pulmonary edema) should have an evaluation including complete blood count, serum creatinine level, and liver transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase). Further, if there is any evidence of disease progression or if acute severe hypertension develops, prompt hospitalization is suggested. Current guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) for management of preeclampsia with severe features suggest delivery after 34 0/7 weeks of gestation. With the outbreak of COVID-19, however, adjustments to this algorithm should be considered including delivery by 30 0/7 weeks of gestation in the setting of preeclampsia with severe features. KEY POINTS: · Outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) warrants fewer office visits.. · Women should be classified for hypertension risk in pregnancy.. · Earlier delivery suggested with COVID-19 and hypertensive disorder..